![]() ![]() Google should not be the one determining what is sensitive and what is not - Google wants to exclude sensitive categories, such as race, religion, sexual orientation, and others from being used by FLoC, to avoid creating cohorts made up of these groups.Coupled with other fingerprinting techniques, it could pave the way for improving fingerprinting accuracy. FLoC adds a strong identifier for fingerprinting - FLoC's cohorts are made up of thousands of users, but that is a tiny group when it comes to fingerprinting.For the average user, FLoC will still reveal more about their interests than before. Sites are informed about browsing habits, even if users never visited them - this is a very strong argument, considering that sites did not know anything about a user if that user never visited the site this is especially true for users who disable third-party cookies in their browsers, and use other protective means.Brave focuses on three aspects of FLoC that it believes make the Web head in the wrong direction: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |